Be agnostic of model and harness: third-party providers and on-prem via the gateway
Be agnostic of the model and harness: use third-party providers and on-prem models, all going through the inference gateway.
37,617 results · Most relevant
Be agnostic of the model and harness: use third-party providers and on-prem models, all going through the inference gateway.
If your domain produces expert feedback, compiler error messages, profiler messages, or tool call error messages, return that as side information to the optimizer.
Roman recommends creating a very small team that goes off into a cave for about a month with the sole objective of building an amazing project, completely isolated from the rest of the company (private Slack channels, a separate part of the office), starting completely from scratch rather than adding to an existing product, and making many micro-decisions every day to move quickly.
Irina advises against a single vague metric like 'agent quality', which hides interesting failures, and recommends a balanced scorecard instead. This is the measurement backbone for the scenario-based loop.
Elie Bakouch recommends that a real benchmark should run multiple seeds with all models in the same condition, and that validating a record should require passing a statistical threshold so it is not just seed optimization.
Elie Bakouch recommends designing benchmark tracks at three access levels: one with no external access to measure pure model capability from weights alone, one with only archive papers to measure literature-grounded research capability, and one with full access including the latest human records to measure best-possible performance.
Jemima Abu shares the lightweight version of the accessibility skill she uses: it tells agents to use semantic HTML only, reach for ARIA when needed, and ensure interactive elements work by keyboard alone.
Jemima Abu recommends auditing your existing code base for accessibility faults before introducing your agent, because an agent introduced into a code base with poorly written code will take that bad code as the standard.
Omar El Mghari recommends an auditing trick: if two errors are canceling out in a model, fix just one of the two and the model's performance will look worse, revealing that the model was wrong. When the 45% real figure replaced the AI-made-up 15%, the forecast error jumped from 1.7% to 28%, proving the original model was wrong despite its good performance.
A failed response must be distinguished from a failed operation before retrying an external request.
Self-evolution changes should be admitted only when both capability and recoverability requirements are met.
Vinoo Ganesh gives vendors and builders a set of due-diligence questions: ask whether a tool can actually verify the numbers it produces rather than make them up; ask if you can click on a number to see its source — whether it's a calculation, an extraction, or a combination — not just after-the-fact annotation; ask whether the model actually writes pointers; ask whether the tool creates a mechanism for verifying the output; ask whether every citation source is checked; ask whether arithmetic is source checked; ask whether there is a mechanism for stopping files that reach clients or customers that they shouldn't reach; and ask what happens to a number or fact that came from nowhere and how hallucinations are handled.
As a vendor or builder, ask: does the model actually write pointers? Does it actually create a mechanism for verifying the output? Is every citation source checked? Is arithmetic source checked? Do you have a mechanism for stopping files that reach clients or customers that they shouldn't reach? What happens to a number that came from nowhere, and what happens when a fact comes from nowhere? How do I actually handle these kinds of hallucinations?
Nouha Dziri concludes that you need to allocate more agents at the software engineering stage that bottlenecks your task. On ProgramBench, extra agents pay off the most in planning: allocating more agents to planning achieves almost the same performance as the full PIV setup but at half the cost. Planning is the bottleneck because you need to figure out the binary's behavior and come up with a detailed plan of what to implement first.
When designing a multi-agent team, you should consider organization (who leads, at which stage workers come in), communication (direct vs. report-to-lead only), team size, model selection, and stage allocation across planning, implementation, and verification. Each one changes how well the team does and how much it costs.
Ryo Lu recommends that if you take one thing away, let it not be to use one more tool, but this: next time you see a very complete answer, first give yourself some time and ask which decision in it you haven't thought about yourself.
Ryo Lu recommends that if you are building tools, you start from three small points: make important assumptions visible, make each edit small enough to feel safe, and make handed-off work retrievable when needed.
The narrator advises targeting keywords that people actually search for and that you can realistically rank for, rather than just publishing pages.
The narrator recommends starting with search, AI search, and video as your foundation, because once a page or video ranks it will keep sending free traffic for years. Get email going from day one to keep visitors coming back from all the other channels. Once that foundation is in place, add short-form video and paid ads on top as accelerators — you don't want to build everything on top of them, but they're great for reach and speed.
Adam Nahari advises working hand-in-hand with the CFO to calculate whether the cost of the initiative at scale — including compute, tokens, and the individuals involved — is significantly lower than the impact it would generate. Many pilots die at the unit-economics stage because they don't pass this test.
Choose sources → to get a library of your own and a daily brief.